Hello, firewalld itself can definitely stay optional. dbus is a bit more complex, but like I said, we already have an hard depends against it.
Cheers, Laurent Bigonville On Thu, 7 May 2015 21:53:22 +0200 Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= <a...@sigxcpu.org> wrote: > Hi, > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:39:20AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Any update on this? > > > > In the debian/changelog, I see that the firewalld support was > > disabled because of the hard-dependency against dbus. But now we > > are indirectly depending against it via policykit anyway. > > I think so, we need to properly test this though and check if we can > keep it as a optional dependency. Nigel, would that be something you > want to try out? > > Cheers, > -- Guido > > > > > Could the firewalld support now? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Laurent Bigonville > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pkg-libvirt-maintainers mailing list > > pkg-libvirt-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-libvirt-maintainers > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
