On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:43:45PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:36:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Altogether, the wording was not restrictive as I thought. > > > > Nevertheless, what would people think of adding a bit more explanation on > > the > > purpose of replacing these files ? Not all readers will have > > /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz available on their computer. > > How > > about the following addition or an equivalent? > > > > "This ensures that these files can be updated distribution-wide when > > introducing > > new architectures." > > OK, please find a new patch incorporating this. > > > Also, adding "at build time" somewhere may clarify that patching these > > files is not > > a good solution. > > The wording "be used instead" seems to convey that already.
Maybe it does to you, but you can never be to clear. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
