Control: tags -1 confirmed On 29/04/15 08:09, Diane Trout wrote: > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 19:07:27 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 28/04/15 08:10, Diane Trout wrote: >>> On Friday, September 05, 2014 17:53:19 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> On 31/08/14 01:08, Diane Trout wrote: >>>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>>> Severity: normal >>>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >>>>> Usertags: transition >>>>> >>>>> For the longest time no one had the time to update qt-gstreamer to the >>>>> GStreamer 1.0 api. We finally managed to do the port and there is >>>>> progress on patches for the few packages that are using qt-gstreamer. >>>> >>>> What's the status of those patches? Are there patches for all the rdeps? >>>> Packages in experimental? Please file bugs and make them block this one. >>>> >>>> Without further details I can't ack this. >>> >>> This is the first time I've tried to do a transition, and I dropped this >>> during the Jessie freeze. (I had guessed the release team would be busy >>> with other things). >>> >>> As for the status of the patches, There's qt-gstreamer itself, it's fine. >>> >>> I know the KDE-Telepathy components are all ported, ktp-common-internals, >>> telepathy-logger-qt, ktp-text-ui, ktp-call-ui, (I've been running against >>> qt- gstreamer 1.0 for months) >>> >>> The other reverse depends appear to be kipi-plugins, kamoso, and qapt >>> >>> Looking through Ubuntu vivid, kipi-plugins is already using qt-gstreamer >>> 1.0 , qapt looks like it stopped using qt gstreamer, and based on a >>> comment from a Kubuntu developer, I think there is currently a buggy >>> patch for kamoso. >>> >>> Is there any documentation about what should be in the transition bugs >>> filed against the other packages? >> >> Mostly patches. Mention they are for a transition and link to this bug >> report. > > I filed bug 783674 with a patch for kamoso, that builds and seems to work. > > Nothing else seems to need patches, so I hadn't filed bug reports. Should I > have?
No, that's alright. > >> >> You didn't mention digikam, which appears in our transition tracker: >> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-qt-gstreamer.html >> >> What's its status? > > Digikam builds against qt-gstreamer-1.0 without any problem, and kubuntu > vivid > is shipping it built against qt-gstreamer-1.0. Good. > The last package was qapt, and that appears to be in Debian experimental > built > against qt-gstreamer-1.0. OK so that will need to be uploaded to unstable when the transition starts. You can file a bug for that. Things look good, so you can upload qt-gstreamer to sid. Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
