Hi
Attached you can find a patch fixing the typo ("the package list of
package" -> "the bug list of package").If there is no objection to the patch, I'll commit it in some days. About the italics or other decoration, I see in the source file that there are sorrounding <var></var> tags, but it seems that no decoration is produced with that tag (nor with <code> tags) when they are inside a <dd> section. I'll try to research a bit and provide a proposal to fix that. Regards -- Laura Arjona https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
? server-control.wml.patch Index: pseudo-packages.wml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/pseudo-packages.wml,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 pseudo-packages.wml --- pseudo-packages.wml 17 Oct 2002 20:12:29 -0000 1.13 +++ pseudo-packages.wml 28 Apr 2015 20:35:31 -0000 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ # Translators: to get translated descriptions create a file # $yourlang/Bugs/pseudo-packages.translated-description -# See http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/polish/Bugs/pseudo-packages.translated-description?rev=1.1&cvsroot=webwml&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup +# See https://cvs.debian.org/webwml/polish/Bugs/pseudo-packages.translated-description?rev=1.1&cvsroot=webwml&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup # for the format #use "$(ENGLISHDIR)/Bugs/pseudo-packages.inc" Index: server-control.wml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/server-control.wml,v retrieving revision 1.102 diff -u -r1.102 server-control.wml --- server-control.wml 16 Nov 2012 23:06:45 -0000 1.102 +++ server-control.wml 28 Apr 2015 20:35:33 -0000 @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ where <var>bugnumber</var> causes breakage in <var>package</var> even though the bug is actually present in the package to which it is assigned, this causes the bug to be listed by default in - the package list of <var>package</var>. This should generally be + the bug list of <var>package</var>. This should generally be used where the bug is severe enough to cause multiple reports from users to be assigned to the wrong package. <code>=</code> sets the affects to the list of packages given, and is the
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
