On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 12:27 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > This patch looks wrong to me -- it changes a void function into an int > function, and changes return values from void to 0, which the caller > ignores.
I dont see a problem there. It is only used for avoiding errors compling with CLANG. If or if not a caller ignores a return value is not an issue. > As far as I can tell, the patch is not needed at all since > upstream has fixed this issue. Not in version 2.3.3 /Willem
