On 17.04.2015 21:54, Ryan Tandy wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 07:45:24AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >> Actually, I pushed a hacked up libldap to my openldap git on alioth >> yesterday, but forgot to update this bug, oops >> >> git://git.debian.org/git/users/tjaalton/openldap.git >> >> it doesn't build anything other than libldap & ldap-utils, and includes >> the applicable Fedora patches (yes three of them were upstream already) >> minus autoconf one which gave me some pain. If it's ok for you, we could >> have a branch on the official pkg repo so folks that need to build their >> own packages could use that as the base. > > Something like a "moznss" branch parallel to master? I don't have any > problem with that.
Ok, I'll push something at some point. > FWIW, the autoconf patch worked for me once I added Build-Depends: > pkg-config. ha, stupid me then.. the error message I got wasn't too obvious >> That might still leave plain 389-ds-base multimaster replication in the >> dust though, but I'm not interested in that personally.. Building a >> second libldap against moznss might be possible, but looks icky.. > > Icky indeed. Based on what you wrote above, sounds like that probably > won't be worth the effort, if it won't be needed in future. > > So as I understand it: this bug is basically wontfix in the official > package at this point; you're (already?) providing an unofficial > nss-libldap that freeipa users can drop in to replace the > gnutls-libldap; and nothing has to be rebuilt to take advantage of that. > Do I have that right? Well, my quick testing shows that a simple library swap isn't enough, but 389 probably needs a rebuild against the new lib. Or replication fails because of something unrelated to this.. don't have much time to test anything in the next couple of weeks. -- t -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
