Package: ghostscript Version: 9.06~dfsg-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer,
Having DVI from "other sources" then TeX. I've tried to PDF it. This fails because DVIPDF complained, that DVIPS is missing.... which is a part of TeX package, while TeX wain't installed on my system when I've experienced that. Ghostscript, which owns DVIPDF does not depend on TeX ... and it should not. But may be depending the entire ghostscript package on TeX is not such a good idea. I would think, that DVIPDF linking ghostscript to TeX, should rather be moved to it's own package, depending on both. -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pl_PL.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages ghostscript depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.56 ii gsfonts 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.2 ii libc6 2.19-18 ii libgs9 9.06~dfsg-2 ghostscript recommends no packages. Versions of packages ghostscript suggests: pn ghostscript-x <none> -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
