Followup-For: Bug #759544

Hi,

> Could you also test
> http://arthurdejong.org/git/nss-pam-ldapd/commit/?id=a726d291b0f6794abec0a0192cf2b2a742648e4a
> to see if that helps. It should give a little more information on why
> start-up failed.

I have built a local package with that patch and just observed this
issue.

Apr 13 12:40:32 pgdb2 ifup[588]: Sending network state change signal to
nslcd...done.
Apr 13 12:40:32 pgdb2 nslcd[686]: Starting LDAP connection daemon:
nslcdnslcd: wait_for_response(): read_response() returned 0 (expected 4)
Apr 13 12:40:32 pgdb2 nslcd[686]: nslcd: unable to daemonize: No data
available
Apr 13 12:40:32 pgdb2 nslcd[686]: failed!

Does that help?

I still think it is caused by a race between the ifupdown trigger and
nslcd startup.

Best Regards,
Bernhard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to