The next command is scheduled to run 5s after *completion* of the previous command, so I'm assuming the problem you speak about is too high frequency of executions, not commands piling up on one another, right?
Contributions welcome :-)
The next command is scheduled to run 5s after *completion* of the previous command, so I'm assuming the problem you speak about is too high frequency of executions, not commands piling up on one another, right?
Contributions welcome :-)