Hi, Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> (2015-03-31): > On 03/17/2015 05:44 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > the libsqlcipher0 package had, erroneously, Priority: standard. It was > > recently > > changed to optional in 3.2.0-1 (this is not mentioned in the changelog > > AFAICT), > > but the ftp-master override still lists the package as standard. > > > > Just FYI, the package has an RC bug, but due to the wrong priority it is in > > the > > "key packages" set, which means it is excluded from the autoremoval > > mechanism. > > The installer team asked to ping them before changing priorities the > last time (at least for >= standard), so I would like for them to ack > this, esp. given where we are in the release process.
yeah, thanks for checking with us! > libsqlcipher0 seems to have no rdepends besides sqlcipher and > libsqlcipher-dev, so lowering the priority to optional should not have > any negative impact. Indeed, I can't think of a reason why anything would explode due to such a change, feel free to go ahead. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
