> Yes, but this is Debian, not the FSF. If Debian wants to use GNU software it must adhere to the GNU software's licenses. And it is doing this already.
There is no problem here. I'm just making a minor remark, that I'd like to see documentation and GFDL docs (in particular) separated nicely from other stuff in non-free. So I'm only talking about a better granulation. >> Paying a little respect to their minor requests (keeping invariant sections >> in tact) is a very little price to pay, for an overwhelming good. > > That is the FSF's position. Debian has decided, over 10 years ago, that > that price is not "very little", and that it is too much. ? You're seeing a problem, where there is in actual fact none. Debian just said that GFDL does not comply with the DFSG, and therefore is not to be placed in the main section. All is good. But this does not contradict a wishlist of having Debian do a finer granulation of contrib and non-free. In particular, to make docs and GFDL docs easier to locate and include. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
