On Mar 29, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote:

> I'm not a huge fan of micro packages and splitting everything up. Where
> would you draw the line.
Uncommon dependencies for not widely used/useful features.
I think that a libdw dependency is justifiable because it provides stack 
traces which may be invaluable for debugging a crash, but so far 
http-based forwarding of logs does not appear to be very popular.
Is it enabled at all in RHEL7? This could be a good benchmark.

> pitti was suggesting a systemd-extras package, but I'm not a huge fan of
> this idea either since it's unclear what would go into this package and
> what not and it complicates things if we have to move stuff around.
Me neither.

> For the time being, I'd say, we should simply be very conservative about
> what features we enable, which means not enabled the remote journal
> features for now.
It would surely be beneficial if the users arguing for support of this 
feature could document its popularity.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: pgpqfiEvCD2KF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to