> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bakefile" That's great! I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but here's my overview:
General: -The upstream tarball contains embedded code copies of the java version of antlr, which violates Debian policy. You'll need to repack the tarball and add +ds to the version number, add a dependency on libantlr-java and possibly modify the build process to accommodate this change. -Remove the .pc directory d/bakefile.lintian-overrides: -Since you're going to have to repack the tarball anyway, would you be able to use libjs-query and libjs-underscore? d/bkl.1: -If you haven't already, you should try sending this upstream. d/control: -You should use a Vcs for the Debian packaging, as most sponsors will require one. If you *really* don't want to, then remove the Vcs-* fields. d/copyright: -Not all files are under the license in COPYING. For example: *extras/vim/bkl.vim *docs/bkl_lexer.py *docs/gen_reference.py *Any embedded code copies -Get rid of the "Copyright (C)" on line 6 d/README.source: -I understand your reasoning, but would it be possible to have separate packages for each incompatible python-antlr3 version, as needed? Good luck getting your package into Debian, Riley Baird
pgpwFBrhfST24.pgp
Description: PGP signature
