On 2015-03-17 09:28:11 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > I have found a later unofficial version of the 8601, and it contains the > following which is the basis for your quoted paragraph: "In an environment > where use is made of a character repertoire based on ISO/IEC 646, “hyphen” > and “minus” are both mapped onto “hyphen-minus”." > > Which is exactly what we're doing already. I don't see any value in trying > to add options to support representations that nobody uses.
OK, so that's fine to always use hyphen-minus, which is always available. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
