On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:38:02 +0200 Christian PERRIER <bubu...@debian.org>
wrote:
Quoting Raph Levien (raph.lev...@gmail.com):
> Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be
> considered the definitive one.
>
> Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant
> advantage to people who have bold styling as part of their syntax
> highlighting.
>
> I really need to update my website but I'm kind of buried in work and other
> things right now.
Thanks for your answer, Raph. With that information and what followed
in further mails, I'll try to build a package with at least the .ttf
file and the .sfd source (if I can find my way on the repository) but,
certainly, having a disributable tarball (with README, license,
OFL-FAQ, etc. and even a Makefile, as Paul Wise suggested) would be
great. But, of course, I understand you may run short of time for
this.
We'll do our best....as often in free software..:-)
Bonjour,
I found out on wikipedia that the inconsolata font has been forked on
Google Foot Directory. It has been fully hinted and a bold variant created.
Project directory:
https://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/ofl/inconsolata/
Log:
https://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/ofl/inconsolata/FONTLOG.txt
I have filled https://bugs.debian.org/780233 to request packaging of the
fork.
--
Antoine Musso
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
