> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > I think that the dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique tag should either: > > > > - reduce its severity, as just an advice for readability, or > > - only be issued when the same short name is used with a different > > description.
Le Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:19:38PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Could you pin point the exact verse of the specification ? Hi Bastien: "Stand-alone License paragraphs can be used to provide the full license text for a given license once, instead of repeating it in each Files paragraph that refers to it." https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#stand-alone-license-paragraph Since it is "can" and not "must", Lintian is too severe. Have a nice week-end, Charles -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
