On Friday, February 27, 2015 11:51:18 PM Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 01:02:31PM -0500, Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > There's nothing left to do for #775263. None of the listed packages > > exist in any of s390x,mips,mipsel. If you need other removals, > > please file bugs for those. > > What about the following binary packages? > > $ dak ls -S -s unstable -a mips,mipsel mia > libmia-2.2-0 | 2.2.2-1+b1 | unstable | mips, mipsel > libmia-2.2-0-dbg | 2.2.2-1+b1 | unstable | mips, mipsel > libmia-2.2-dev | 2.2.2-1+b1 | unstable | mips, mipsel > mia-tools | 2.2.2-1+b1 | unstable | mips, mipsel > mia-tools-dbg | 2.2.2-1+b1 | unstable | mips, mipsel > > $ dak ls -S -s unstable -a mips,mipsel deal.ii > libdeal.ii-8.1.0 | 8.1.0-4 | unstable | mipsel > libdeal.ii-dbg | 8.1.0-4 | unstable | mipsel > libdeal.ii-dev | 8.1.0-4 | unstable | mipsel > > $ dak ls -S -s unstable -a mips,mipsel flexbar > flexbar | 2.50-1 | unstable | mips, mipsel > > They all build-depend on libtbb-dev. > > Should I file a bug report per source package?
Yes. One removal bug per source package is what works with our tools. > Besides, tbb-examples was an arch:all and is now an arch:any. Does it > require any specific action? Package tracker says that old binaries > are missing for that package. I've just removed the arch:all packages. I missed that earlier. Thanks for letting me know. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
