On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 at 21:27:49 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 18/01/15 14:34, Neil Williams wrote: > > For the benefit of the bug report, I've tried Simon's patch and I do not > > get the expected results. > > I might be misremembering, but I don't think evince's libevdocument-3-4 > is what used the new symbol in libpoppler: I think it's only > libpoppler-glib (in that particular dependency chain at least) that uses > it.
http://codesearch.debian.net/results/getAlternateName/page_0 suggests that this version of events is accurate: we're not trying to prevent partial upgrades of the form new evince, old libpoppler-glib8, old libpoppler46 because evince doesn't call getAlternateName anyway. Rather, we're trying to prevent partial upgrades of the form new libpoppler-glib8, old libpoppler46 for which Neil's test results look fine. > (I don't know why people were doing those partial upgrades in the first > place.) Still no idea about that... S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
