On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:26:02PM +0100, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > Yes, a reduced testcase would be much appreciated. I don't have access to > https://codereview.qt-project.org/105039 and I wouldn't know what to do > anyway. :-) > oh, right, it was a draft, invite only. fixed now. i think you'll figure it out easily. anyway, cloning the whole thing seems like overkill, indeed. you can just get the patched version of the file from the diff view. from there it is extracting the code into a minimal qt/qmake project. i expect this to be a somewhat time-consuming iterative process, so i'm not exactly in a hurry ...
> (BTW: You did clear the cache before you compiled the changed source code, > right? Otherwise a cache hit is expected from the previous experiments, of > course. Just checking.) > i retried with multiple string and number variants i didn't use before, so this is of no concern. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
