On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 18:21 +0100, Rafał Pietrak wrote: > W dniu 07.02.2015 17:48, Ben Hutchings pisze: > > On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 09:36 +0100, Rafal Pietrak wrote: > > [...] > [-----------] > >> > >> And a direct "insmod /lub/modules/3.2.*/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko" doesn't > >> work either. > > How does it fail? What error messages do you see (both at the shell and > > in the kernel log)? > The command is silent, returns 0 (meaning: echo $? ==> 0 ... which is > surprising when I think of it now, since strace reports "exit=1"), and > the log contains nothing. I only know that it faile because neither > lsmod show it, nor mount starts working. > > But I've also done a strace of the insmod (attached) - may be this'll > give something.
write(2, "insmod: ERROR: could not insert "..., 113insmod: ERROR: could not insert module /lib/modules/3.2.0-4-486/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko: Unknown symbol in module ) = 113 This implies that the wrong kernel image is being loaded. As you are using GRUB this is surprising. What does 'type insmod' say? > And regarding the screen reporting errors during the boot; this is the > first one (when booting 3.16*586 kernel): "Failed to start Load Kernel > Modules". Very strange... Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
