Package: systemd Version: 215-10 Followup-For: Bug #756903 Hello,
why is it such a problem to put sshd on the list of services to start on failure? Surely it should only start if it was enabled on the system in the first place. However, starting sshd should not cause anything disastrous when some of your disks are missing. At worst you would be unable to log in because some of the disks are actually needed for that. Thanks Michal -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (171, 'unstable'), (151, 'experimental'), (121, 'precise-updates'), (121, 'precise-security'), (121, 'precise'), (101, 'stable'), (101, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.18.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages systemd depends on: ii acl 2.2.52-2 ii adduser 3.113+nmu3 ii initscripts 2.88dsf-58 ii libacl1 2.2.52-2 ii libaudit1 1:2.4-1+b1 ii libblkid1 2.25.2-4.1 ii libc6 2.19-13 ii libcap2 1:2.24-6 ii libcap2-bin 1:2.24-6 ii libcryptsetup4 2:1.6.6-4 ii libgcrypt20 1.6.2-4+b1 ii libkmod2 18-3 ii liblzma5 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2+b3 ii libpam0g 1.1.8-3.1 ii libselinux1 2.3-2 ii libsystemd0 215-10 ii mount 2.25.2-4.1 ii sysv-rc 2.88dsf-58 ii udev 215-10 ii util-linux 2.25.2-4.1 Versions of packages systemd recommends: ii dbus 1.8.12-3 ii libpam-systemd 215-10 Versions of packages systemd suggests: ii systemd-ui 3-2 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
