On 29.01.2015 22:54, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: [...] >> I'm fine with either one of the solutions above and I would file an >> unblock request. What do you prefer? > > As I said above, I am not very convinced that either this solution or > the one involving changes to sdl-mixer1.2 is correct and solves all > problems potentially created in this case (maybe no solution is 100% > satisfactory for all cases if the library is not backwards > compatible). > > So I would prefer not to do it for sdl-mixer. Modifying tecnoballz is > probably the easiest/quickest, and it is probably going to get > approved without much hassle from release managers. >
Ok, I'll take care of it tomorrow and adjust the dependency on tecnoballz accordingly. Cheers
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
