On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Why? Option A, i.e. the only option, is already the status quo, so > what's the point?
It affirms the decisions which have been made by the other teams in Debian, and resolves this particular issue. Issues which are properly submitted to the CTTE have to be resolved, and the way that they're resolved is with a resolution. > What possibly is there to gain from further init system meddling just > when the clouds were clearing? I'm unsure how this particular resolution meddles at all with the init system decision; it explicitly doesn't change anything, and points out the multiple different ways that Developers have worked to mitigate any issues with the transition. If your point is that we shouldn't resolve this issue at all, and should simply leave the bug open in the BTS, I disagree completely. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com Fate and Temperament are two words for one and the same concept. -- Novalis [Hermann Hesse _Demian_] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
