On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:39:29 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Maybe this leads to a rule like: > If maintainer scripts (including triggers!) use some module > from perl-modules, the package needs to depend on perl-modules. > An indirect dependency through perl is not sufficient.
This sounds error-prone to me, as maintainers would have to find out which package contains the module, and track this information when modules are moved. I guess Niko's idea of adding a Breaks on the old perl to perl-base and perl-modules is both less work and more reliable. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #384: it's an ID-10-T error -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
