On 18/01/15 14:34, Neil Williams wrote: > For the benefit of the bug report, I've tried Simon's patch and I do not > get the expected results. ... > I rebuilt poppler with the second nmudiff [0] and then built evince > with that version of poppler installed.
I might be misremembering, but I don't think evince's libevdocument-3-4 is what used the new symbol in libpoppler: I think it's only libpoppler-glib (in that particular dependency chain at least) that uses it. If that's the case, then your test results look good: > neil@sylvester:poppler-0.26.5$ dpkg-deb -I > .../libpoppler-glib8_0.26.5-2.1_amd64.deb|grep Depends > Pre-Depends: multiarch-support > Depends: ... libpoppler46 (>= 0.26.5-2~), ... which would have avoided the partial upgrade described in <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767659#10>: ii libpoppler-glib8:amd64 0.26.5-2 amd64 PDF rendering library (GLib-based shared library) ii libpoppler46:amd64 0.26.5-1 amd64 PDF rendering library The first email in the bug doesn't have as much information as that, but the reporter said upgrading libpoppler46 (but nothing else) fixed it for them: 2014-11-01 14:15:30 upgrade libpoppler46:i386 0.26.5-1 0.26.5-2 which is consistent with their situation being similar. On the duplicate bugs, <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768475#25> reports the same partial upgrade, and <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768985> doesn't have enough information to say either way. (I don't know why people were doing those partial upgrades in the first place.) S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
