On Saturday 10 January 2015 11:18:58 Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > Tim Ruehsen <tim.rueh...@gmx.de> writes: > > On Friday 09 January 2015 14:51:00 Darshit Shah wrote: > >> I don't see any issue with this patch. No-verbose does need to print a > >> little bit more information I think. > >> > >> However, @giuseppe, @Tim, do you'll see any issues with scripts > >> parsing Wget's --nv output if we apply this patch? > > > > For me, it is fine. You never know about how good or bad scripts are > > grepping Wget's output. I would say, if this patch breaks a script, the > > script should be fixed. > > I am fine with it too, as anyway scripts should not depend from the wget > output.
Pushed. Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
