Dear Vincent, Thanks for your review.
The purpose of debian/patches/debian-changes-0.1.95+gtk2-3.2.patch was to switch to source format 3.0 (quilt). It contains the changes between the upstream and Debian version 3.2. Many files were changed, not just autoconf-related ones, so I need this patch to incorporate those changes. Why use 3.0 (quilt)? Beacuse some sponsors insist on it, so I thought it's somewhat like mandatory... If you prefer source format 1.0, this patch is not needed, of course. There are some other patches, which are not strictly needed, but I thought they improve the package, I could explain in detail if you wish. Yes, I could adopt lletters-media if this is a precondition for adopting lletters. I'm not familiar with what team-maintaining is, at a glance it seems that lletters is not well suited for Games team. Regards, Dmitry > Can you also adopt lletters-media at the same time? That package is > orphaned and is a dependency of lletters. Would you consider > team-maintaining this package in the Debian Games team [1] as well? > You'll generally find it easier to find sponsors within a team. > > I'm mostly concerned about the size of some of your patches in > debian/patches; it makes your package hard to review, and they're > probably obsolete as well (e.g. what's the purpose of > debian/patches/debian-changes-0.1.95+gtk2-3.2.patch when you're > running autoreconf during the build?). > Regards, > Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
