On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 08:15:27PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 12.12.2014 um 13:53 schrieb Josh Triplett: > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:34:37AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Am 12.12.2014 um 00:29 schrieb Josh Triplett: > > >>>> Personally, I wouldn't mind adding support for that, that said, you > >>>> really need to convince the release team first. > >>> > >>> Happy to do so. Do you want me to file a request with the release team > >>> and > >>> point directly to the upstream diffs, asking if backports of those seem > >>> acceptable? > >> > >> Yes, feel free to do so. > > > > OK, I can do that. > > > > Afaics, this hasn't happened yet. Since we are rather late in the > release cycle, and from now on, only release critical bugs will be > accepted by the release team, I'm going to reject/close this bug report > as it is a rather large patch.
I was going to suggest that myself, actually; AFAICT the freeze policy was *already* "important severity or higher" a month ago, so it wasn't an option then either. > What seems more feasible to me, is that we provide a newer version via > backports, which will already include that functionality. Sounds reasonable to me. - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org