tag 774339 pending thanks On 01/01/15 03:36, jnqnfe wrote: > Depends: > - util-linux (getopt, mkswap) > - mount > - coreutils (cp, mv, rm, touch, mkdir, wc, stat, basename, chroot, > echo, printf, uname, date, expr, sort, uniq, dirname, head, du, dd, > rmdir, chmod, ls, tr, cat, cut, pwd, ln; and also sha256sums which will > be needed by the #718225 solution) > - findutils (xargs, find) > - grep > - dpkg (dpkg, dpkg-query) > - sed
all of the above are essential, no depends required. > - gawk awk is provided through mawk (required), we do not use gawk'isms, no depends required. > - gzip (gzip, gunzip, these are used in various places with no choice > for other compression tools, as well as in places where there is choice) > - tar > - diffutils (diff) > - debianutils (which) all of the above are essential, no depends required. > - apt-utils (apt-ftparchive used by binary_package-lists script on line > 159 and not within chroot, if there are any package lists, which there > always are, since config makes one) live-build already handles this (with an error message) in the case the user builds non-chrooted (which is not the default); but you're right, this should go to recommends.. done in git. > - dctrl-tools (grep-aptavail used in share/bin/Packages script) "Packages" is executed in the chroot, not on the host, no depends required. > Recommends: > - sparc-utils (elftoaout and piggyback/piggyback64 used for sparc > netboot images) sparc is gone. > - gpgv (used for progress-linux in bootstrap_archive-keys added to suggests, thanks. > Suggests: > - udev (udevadm binary used if available by functions/losetup.sh) no, either you already have udev and then it's used, or it's not and then you don't need it. > - man-db (man command, used by functions/man.sh if available) given that man-db is important, i think a suggests is useless. > - git (used if pulling a config via git) that's too far fetched imho. > cpio should actually perhaps be elevated from its existing status under > recommends to depends, since it is required by the > installer_debian-installer script for all non-netboot builds in that > script, and thus in my mind falls under 'required to provide a > significant amount of functionality'. d-i inclusion is non-default, so recommends is fine. > There's also an issue with certain configurable items (e.g. where the > user has a choice of compression utility) where there is no check within > Check_defaults() that the binary exists, and another issue that for at > least one instance of a utility run under chroot no Check_package() > based check is performed; but both of these can be addressed separately. > In fact I have now reported them separately. thanks -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
