Hey Michael, Michael Biebl [2014-12-30 17:15 +0100]: > Second, I'm not convinced that the current defaults, which are > size-based, are buggy and actually need a "fix". By limiting the journal > to 7 days, we imho unnecessarily make it less useful. I don't see a good > reason to not utilize available free disk space.
Will journald shrink the journal dynamically when disk space gets low while it's running? It sounded like you needed to restart it for that. On long-running servers the journal would be restarted very seldomly. But then again, the same would probably be true for time based truncation. If journald DTRT while running, I'm fine with reverting the commit and closing this bug as wontfix. Guten Rutsch! Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
