Yeah.. After some more check I'm now sure it's a bug in driver side. Sadly Parallels doesn't have open source drivers so I can't patch it's installing behavior... (Ugly non-free software!) Sorry for the misplaced bug report.
> 在 2014年12月17日，下午4:34，Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> 写道： > >> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 at 14:52:33 +0800, Shan Ting wrote: >> sudo stat /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so >> File: ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so’ -> ‘libGL.so.1.2.0’ > > OK so far... > >> sudo stat /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0 >> stat: cannot stat ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0’: No such file >> or directory > > ... but that seems wrong for the packages you have installed. You said > you have: > >> Package: libgl1-mesa-dev >> Version: 10.3.2-1 >> ... >> ii libgl1-mesa-glx 10.3.2-1 > > but those same packages on the same (amd64) architecture do provide > libGL.so.1.2.0: > > % dpkg -s libgl1-mesa-dev > ... > Version: 10.3.2-1 > Depends: ..., libgl1-mesa-glx (= 10.3.2-1), ... > ... > % dpkg -L libgl1-mesa-glx:amd64 > ... > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 > >> I’m not using lx-alternative-fglrx, glx-alternative-nvidia or >> glx-diversions. The libGL.so.10.1.1.28614 is come from my graphic card >> driver(parallels). > > Then I think this is a bug in your graphics card driver: it is overwriting > and deleting files owned by the packaging system, but not finishing the job > by taking responsibility for setting the target of the libGL.so symlink > (and not participating in glx-alternatives like the non-free drivers > packaged by Debian developers do, which would be the ideal thing). > >> Is there some reasons to use libGL.so.1.2.0 directly rather than >> libGL.so.1? > > That's how libraries' development symlinks normally work. For instance, > picking a random library for which I have development files > installed (Gtk 2): > > % ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Oct 10 18:57 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so -> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.25 > default|archetype% ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Oct 10 18:57 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 -> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.25 > % ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.25 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4501992 Oct 10 18:57 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.25 > > The real file is the versioned one, and the development symlink and the > SONAME (runtime) symlink both point to it. > > Regards, > S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
