On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:15:51PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 patch > > Hi William > > On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 18:28:05 +0100 William Bonnet <will...@wbonnet.net> > wrote: > > > If it is double-checked with upstream, then this bug report > > > should be reassigned to openssl package. > > I'll do it as soon as upstream answer to my bug report. > > I tried to find the openssl bug you seem to refer to, but I couldn't > find it. If you made one, it would be great to use the "Forwarded" > control tag to keep a link to it. It would help to get this (RC) bug > further by knowing the stance of upstream.
Which upstream? Upsteam openssl is saying that this is intentional behaviour, and as such I won't be fixing this. > Also, I am not sure that the current bug is really RC. What is the > justification for it? I assume the FTBFS of nodejs makes this an RC bug for nodejs. It cleary is not an RC bug in openssl. I suggest we just reassign this to nodejs? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
