Le 08/12/2014 11:38, Francesco Poli a écrit : > The following part looks problematic: > > | The Lines KSplash theme is © 2013 Martin Klapetek, © 2014 Aurélien Couderc > | under the GPLv2 with artwork from Juliette Taka Belin, Nuno Pinheiro under > the > | GPLv2 license. > > First of all, the artwork by Juliette is not under the GPL v2 or any > later version, not under the GPL v2 (only). > But the question is: are the other artwork also under the GPL v2 or any > later version? It's not too clear from the description, but, *in case* > the Lines KSplash theme is derived from the artwork by Juliette which > is based on the Debian “Open Use” Logo (with the “Debian” label), we > could again face the issue due to LGPLv3 / GPLv2 incompatibility... > Please check with the relevant copyright holders and update the > debian/copyright file accordingly. After checking : - we’re talking about the script that is © 2013 Martin Klapetek, © 2014 Aurélien Couderc under the GPLv2+ (not just v2) - the artwork is a from Juliette Taka Belin (GPLv2+) and the Oxygen Icon Theme contributors (LGPLv3+) http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/o/oxygen-icons/oxygen-icons_4.14.0-1_copyright
I propose the following :
| The Lines KSplash script is © 2013 Martin Klapetek, © 2014 Aurélien
Couderc
| under the GPLv2 or any later version.
|
| The artwork for the Lines KSplash theme is © 2014 Juliette Taka Belin
under
| the GPLv2 or any later version and © 2007-2014 from the Oxygen Icon Theme
| contributors under the LGPLv3 or any later version.
And we were missing the 2012 copyright for Eshat Cakar for login box of
the Lines KDM themes :
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/Roj
that is not Adrien’s work as I thought but Eshat’s (fortunately under
GPLv2+).
> There may be issues with the following parts, as well:
>
> | The Joy GDM is © 2012 Paul Tagliamonte GPLv2, with work
> | from all the previous authors of that file, and artwork from Adrien Aubourg
> under
> | the GPLv3 license.
> |
> | The Joy KDM theme is © 2012 Eshat Cakar and © 2010 Roman Shtylman GPLv2
> | with artwork from Adrien Aubourg under the GPLv3 license.
> |
> | The Joy KSplash theme is © 2012 Eshat Cakar, Nuno Pinheiro, Riccardo
> Iaconelli GPLv2
> | with artwork from Adrien Aubourg under the GPLv3 license.
> |
> | The Joy grub theme is © 2012 Paul Tagliamonte GPLv2, using artwork from
> Adrien
> | Aubourg licensed under GPLv3 license.
>
> Any of these four themes may be troublesome, if is a work derived from
> GPLv3 artwork and from GPLv2 parts is created.
> Since the Joy artwork by Adrien Aubourg was previously licensed under
> the GPLv2 and has subsequently been re-licensed under the GPLv3
> (without modifying the artwork itself, if I understand correctly:
> please confirm!), then we may solve the issues with these four themes
> by stating that: "The Joy theme is © 2012 Adrien Aubourg and released
> under the GPL license, version 2 or 3."
Adrien nicely accepted to relicense the Joy theme under the GPLv2+ so it
solves the incompatibilities. I’ll update the copyrights.
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/Joy
As Adrien mentioned, it would be good to impose GPLv2+ for future theme
contributions to avoid headaches for too many people.
Then I propose dropping :
| The Joy grub theme is © 2012 Paul Tagliamonte GPLv2, using artwork from Adrien
| Aubourg licensed under GPLv3 license.
That « theme » is the grub background and like the Joy wallpaper is
strictly based on Adrien’s work + debian open logo without debian, so
it’s already covered by the global copyright statement about the Joy theme.
I see the statement as more noise than information.
I also removed mentions of the « splashy » spacefun theme as splashy is
not used anymore on recent desktops.
> Another issue could be:
>
> | Spacefun plymouth theme is © 2010 Aurelien Couderc and released under the
> GPLv3
> | license, using artwork from Valessio S. Brito.
>
> I am not sure: is the part of the Spacefun plymouth theme that's
> copyrighted by you a script that loads Valessio's artwork? Or is
> something that combines with Valessio's artwork, thus creating a whole
> work derived from both parts?
> In the former case I can see no problems; in the latter case, there's
> again an incompatibility issue (GPLv2 vs. GPLv3).
Hard to say really. The copyright is for the script, the script uses
artwork elements to build what’s displayed, where do we stand ?…
Anyway I hereby relicense the script under the GPLv2+, and will update
the script and copyright file accordingly.
All that is committed to the repository, would you mind reviewing again
the latest version ?
(Revision 342).
Thanks,
--Aurélien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
