On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 14:56 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 12/04/2014 02:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> > 
> > [cc to -release replaced with the bug]
> > 
> > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 12:38 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > 
> > +gnupg (1.4.18-5) unstable; urgency=medium
> > +
> > +  [ Daniel Kahn Gillmor ]
> > +  * move to debhelper 9
> > 
> > What's the rationale for that? It's on
> > https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html#getting-unblocks
> > list of things not to do...
> 
> why so it is, i'm sorry i missed that.  That was done months before the
> freeze in our development branch but not rolled out in a public release.
> 
> If you'd prefer, i can produce a 1.4.18-6 with that reverted (i'd
> probably also collapse the documentation cleanup into a single patch as
> well, rather than including the triplet of upstream git commits
> independently).
> 
> Shall i do that?

Yes, please.

> Thanks for the prompt review, and sorry to have missed the debhelper
> compat level.

No problem.

For the record, I'm okay with the rest of the diff (modulo it needing a
d-i ack due to producing a udeb), although with fingers crossed that the
--verify change doesn't bite us.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to