So in the last email Wookey enumerates a lot of things what he did during the
last months. Maybe he should have mentioned his ballerina lessons used for his
performances during the DebConf talks too. However ever all of these have in
common, that this has nothing to do at all with the work he committed to do.
Further he cites a paragraph from the debian-bootstrap sprint summary, which
reads:
"""
The report from that meeting
https://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2014/BootstrapSprint/Results says:
----------
3.13. Multiarch cross-toolchains vs single-arch cross-toolchains
This contentious issue was discussed, and is partly covered under other
headings. Wookey prefers the multiarch builds, Doko prefers the single-arch
bootstrap builds. We agreed that either provides useful cross-toolchains. It's
not clear whether it's easier to fix the Ubuntu cross-toolchain-base packages
to do a bootstrap build in Debian, or to fix the blockers for multiarch builds
in the archive. Whichever is working first should get uploaded.
"""
According to
https://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2014/BootstrapSprint/Results?action=diff&rev1=30&rev2=31
the last sentence was added on Aug 29 during DebConf, long after the sprint
happened, with a commment "must be almost the final review", without mentioning
anything. I call this counterfeiting the summary of the sprint. I assume this
helped to convince other people to sneak in these packages into Debian. What is
this if not "bad faith"?
Again, the rest of the email talking about willing to work together doesn't
match the his actions at all.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
