Control: block -1 by 770627
On 2014-12-03 22:03, David Kalnischkies wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Release Team, > > [...] > Hi, I blocked this on 770627, because I have a question about the interaction between apt and dpkg vs. triggers. Please have a look at that bug and follow up with any relevant information. >> The changes you proposed seems entirely reasonable. Please upload them >> to unstable and remove the "moreinfo" tag once it has been accepted into >> unstable. >> You are welcome to add translation updates to that and the fix for >> #765687 as well. > > Done. Note that I applied #767774 before #765687, which is boring by > itself, but effects the very same code, so the backport of #765687 would > actually include the two-line #767774 as well anyway, so better be > explicit about it… > Ok, seems reasonable at first glance - thanks. > >> Let have a look at the apt-keys regressions after all of this has >> migrated to testing. > > I took also the liberty to apply the one-line #754436 fix as its the > only thing related to apt-key with a reasonable severity/change ratio. > Nobody I know of is using fingerprints (for now) and bugs like the 40 > keyrings limit from gnupg is annoying, but the amount of (Debian) users > effected by it is limited to a point that I don't want to annoy you with >> 400 line changes (beside that I haven't the time for it either). > Ack. > >>> In regards to the trigger change in dpkg: Nobody commented further, so >>> I feel only half as bad for not having done much about it, but that will >>> surely need quite some changes, so if this isn't magically going forward >>> soon I would post-prune that to 1.0.9.5 for now – just so you know. >> >> At this time we just received a new dpkg upload that hopefully deals >> with the trigger issues for Jessie. If so, we might be able to tag >> #769609 with -jessie ignore. > > I presume Guillem would be unhappy to carry the workaround to stretch > (and we will have to make sure to not forget about it as this path will > be mostly untested up until jessie->stretch upgrades are tested), > but your call. I haven't given the dpkg change a closer look yet though > so it might be nicer/works better than I expect it to be… > I could be interested in this patch for Jessie. However, let me come back to you on that when I got a better overview of the situation. > > For everyone following along looking for a diff, the final diff of > 1.0.9.3 -> 1.0.9.4 is probably best viewed in chunks via git, e.g.: > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/log/ > > > Thanks & best regards > > David Kalnischkies > Noted, thanks. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
