forwarded 766788 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78906 reassign 766788 libicu52 thanks
Hi, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:34:27AM +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Po, říj 27 2014, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:24:43AM +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > >> >> I can reproduce this in both unstable and testing > >> >> (1:4.3.3~rc2~git20141011-1). I cannot reproduce this in the version > >> > > >> > And why are you then not marking it as such? > >> > >> How can I do that next time? https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting does > >> not mention how to mark multiple version. > > > > You add 1:4.3.3~rc2~git20141011-1 in Version: and the BTS then knows > > it also affect 1:4.3.3~rc2-1 (see [1]) > > > >> >> from libreoffice.org (LibreOffice_4.3.2_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz). > >> > > >> > And with 4.3.3 rc1? (Or rc2 which would be in the next days) > >> > You right now compare a 4.3.2 with a -between-4.3.3-rc1-and-rc2 > >> > or 4.3.3 rc2 ;) > >> > > >> >> After the crash the following information appears on the terminal: > >> >> > >> >> *** stack smashing detected ***: > >> >> /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin terminated > >> >> ======= Backtrace: ========= > >> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x72faf)[0x7fdd44a1ffaf] > >> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7fdd44aa30a7] > >> >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x0)[0x7fdd44aa3070] > >> > > >> > But given it runs into the fortify functions it probably won't appear > >> > in 4.3.3 rc1 upstream until it's a real crash also there; upstream > >> > doesn't > >> > use those hardening flags. > >> > >> I was able to reproduce this in my own build of libreoffice. Any hint > > > > But probably without hardening or with? > > With. I run > > eval $(dpkg-buildflags --export=sh) > > which corresponds to > > export CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security" > export CPPFLAGS="-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" > export CXXFLAGS="-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security" > export FCFLAGS="-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong" > export FFLAGS="-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong" > export GCJFLAGS="-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong" > export LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,relro" > export OBJCFLAGS="-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security" > export OBJCXXFLAGS="-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security" > > before compiling. > > > Same backtrace or something else? > > Probably the same, but with more information: I see. I got a mail today from upstream saying --- snip --- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 20:40:25 +0000 From: Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> To: r...@debian.org Subject: fix for https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766788 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=cced2f6b866877c39afe86f4af18622cb4022bef fixes https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766788 C. --- snip --- so it actually seems to be a ICU bug... Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
