On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:30:37AM +1100, Sammy Spets wrote:
>Hi John,
>
>Thanks for the swift response.
>
>On 10-Feb-05 08:23, John Goerzen wrote:
>> And here we see that no reply was ever received.  I'd try running
>> OfflineIMAP with -1 to start with.  If that works, try increasing
>> concurrency by 1 each time and see if you can find a point where it
>> stops working.  Once you do, you can grab a debug log with -d imap.
>> Maybe there is something weird going on.
>
>I ran strace using -1 previously. I ran 'offlineimap -1 -d imap' and it
>freezes here:
>
>Syncing Underwater.Announcements: IMAP -> Maildir
>DEBUG[imap]:   56:14.47 > BKPF44 SELECT Underwater.Announcements
>
>The full imap debug output is available at www.synerger.com/oimap.debug
>
>Server is dovecot. Is there another way I can slow down offlineimap so I 
>can test whether dovecot is dying under the barrage of commands?
>
>Oh! Another user of the same server that uses offlineimap does not have
>any troubles with it.

What I see occasionally with dovecot and offlineimap is a significant
slowdown on large individual pieces of mail. If I leave things running
for a few minutes it will recover and continue eventually. Can you get
debug from the server to see how big that particular mail is?

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to