I agree that autofs-5.0.8, now in Debian unstable, is clearly broken.

Looking in what appears to be an upstream location (
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v5/), I see evidence of
active, on-going development. There is not only an upstream version 5.0.9
that is mentioned in a previous post about the present bug but also an
upstream version 5.0.10, as well as what looks like a 5.1.x branch.

Both 5.0.10 and 5.1.1 seem to have been made available in 2014 Oct, just
last month as I write this.

Are these hopelessly broken, too? It seems as though an update to 5.0.10
might be in order.

What am I missing?

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote:

> 16.11.2014 00:29, Thomas Vaughan wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:23:40 +0300 Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru
> <mailto:m...@tls.msk.ru>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sure, why not -- is `important' enough?  I'd like to make it RC
> >> so autofs is removed from debian finally, as it is just too
> >> broken
> > ​.
> >
> > If autofs might be removed from Debian, then I have a question.
> >
> > Is there a different, less buggy package that I could install to get the
> same effect?
> >
> > What is the best practice?
> >
> > I have one machine at home with accounts for my wife and kids.
> >
> > I export the passwd file via nis.​
> >
> > ​I have another machine that they like to log into and still magically
> see all their stuff.
> >
> > How do I easily accomplish this in another way, without having to set up
> a bunch links and other brittle config on the non-master machine?​
>
> I for one don't know a way to do this.  There used to be amd (automount
> deaemon),
> but it looks like it is not mantained anymore.  There was autofs, but it
> is broken.
>
> Thanks,
>
> /mjt
>
>


-- 
Thomas E. Vaughan

Reply via email to