Hi,

Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > So if anyone wants to keep zsh-static and is reading this, please
> > _tell_ us!
> 
> Removing zsh-static would be better than keeping a buggy one,
> in particular one that isn't really static.

Well, the current state is _static_, but castrated so that some
features are missing (to ensure that staticness). I don't see it as a
bug in zsh or in the packaging specifically, more as a necessary
annoyance which may get new chances to be fixed over time.

                Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `-    |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to