14.11.2014 13:12, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 13:02:04 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > >> 14.11.2014 12:42, Julien Cristau wrote: >> >>> FWIW I don't believe build-conflicts on libc achieve anything, so I'm >>> unhappy with -13. >> >> I'm not happy with it either, but why do you say it does not achieve >> anything? Why do you say so, is this control field ignored? >> > Its only effect is to get that package removed if it's installed. > Somehow removing libc doesn't seem like a good idea.
Well, so it is clear that building will not succeed if only old glibc is installed. Note the amd64 build log for example: current build-conflict causes the buildd to upgrade libc6, because it has 2.12-11 installed which conflicts with building busybox, so the condition is actually working. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=busybox&arch=amd64&ver=1%3A1.22.0-13&stamp=1415831665 But it is ugly at least, I agree with that. Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
