Hello Wookey, On November 12, 2014 12:44:12 AM Wookey wrote:
> Is there a good reason why gccxml has config from such an old gcc? > Could it be moved forward to a newer base? These are questions for upstream, but I believe the answer to the final question is "yes; as soon as someone steps up to do the work". I have seen this same question come up on the GCC XML mailing list for probably half a dozen years. I would not hold my breath. Question for you: what are you building that needs gccxml? I have always believed that it was mainly needed for ITK. ITK currently doesn't target the architectures you mentioned, so omission of gccxml won't be a problem. Regards, -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
