Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
I recently noticed (through the autopkgtest regression [1]) that fatrace's power-usage-report got broken with the latest powertop 2.6. So I made a new upstream release 0.9 which adjusts the powertop output format parsing accordingly. It's just a two line diff (complete debdiff attached, there no build system noise etc.). Both the automatic and a manual test are happy again now [2]. Thanks for considering, Martin unblock fatrace/0.9-1 [1] https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-adt-fatrace/2/ARCH=i386,label=adt/console [2] https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-adt-fatrace/3/ARCH=i386,label=adt/console -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
diff -Nru fatrace-0.8/debian/changelog fatrace-0.9/debian/changelog
--- fatrace-0.8/debian/changelog 2014-09-23 16:07:44.000000000 +0200
+++ fatrace-0.9/debian/changelog 2014-11-07 09:19:03.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+fatrace (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * New upstream release:
+ - power-usage-report: Adjust parsing to also work for powertop 2.6.
+
+ -- Martin Pitt <mp...@debian.org> Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:18:56 +0100
+
fatrace (0.8-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream bug fix release: Fix the "Value too large for defined data
diff -Nru fatrace-0.8/NEWS fatrace-0.9/NEWS
--- fatrace-0.8/NEWS 2014-09-23 15:56:19.000000000 +0200
+++ fatrace-0.9/NEWS 2014-11-07 09:17:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+0.9 (2014-11-07)
+----------------
+ - power-usage-report: Adjust parsing to also work for powertop 2.6.
+
0.8 (2014-09-23)
----------------
- The previous O_LARGEFILE change to fix "Value too large for defined data
diff -Nru fatrace-0.8/power-usage-report fatrace-0.9/power-usage-report
--- fatrace-0.8/power-usage-report 2014-09-23 15:56:19.000000000 +0200
+++ fatrace-0.9/power-usage-report 2014-11-07 09:17:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
for (search_header, print_header) in blocks:
# skip until search_header
- while i < len(lines) and not lines[i].lower().startswith('**' +
search_header):
+ while i < len(lines) and not search_header in lines[i].lower():
i += 1
i += 1 # skip header
# skip empty lines
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
i += 1
print('====== %s ======' % print_header)
- while i < len(lines) and lines[i]:
+ while i < len(lines) and lines[i] and not lines[i].startswith('_____'):
print(lines[i])
i += 1
print('')
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
