Hi Paul,

On  Fr 07 Nov 2014 10:50:33 CET, paul.szabo wrote:

Dear Mike,

Maybe the issue is
  X Generic Event Extension
  http://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.7/doc/xextproto/geproto.html
of variable length, as yet un-supported by nxproxy?

Pre-empting anything below: I have now added code to nxproxy to
correctly handle (support) "X Generic Event Extension" messages,
and nautilus runs happy. - I will now test for a few more days,
clean up my code (removing the debug lines), then post the patches.


AWESOME!!! Looking forward to that/those patch/es.

---

Seems that the issues I had with sequence numbers were a result
of nxproxy mis-interpreting the data stream: my GenEvt patches
seem to have "cured" those complaints.

ok...

---

the question here again is if nautilus crashes
   (a) in nxagent scenarios
   (b) in nxproxy -S + Xvfb/Xephyr scenarios

I do not use nxagent, have no need for it.
I do not use Xvfb or Xephyr, but use the Xorg server.

Do you test nautilus in some desktop shell (e.g. GNOMEv3) or do you
launch nautilus as a standalone (aka rootless, seamless) application?

If server-side applications bind to nxproxy -S directly, then the code
path (very roughly speaking) should be:

   (1) nautilus
   (1.1) libcairo
   (1.2) lib-X.Org's client extensions (e.g. libXext, libXrandr, etc.)
   (2) nxproxy -S
   (3) nxproxy -C
   (4) X.org server on client-side

What I have is: on the "thin client" I run:
  Xorg -query loginserver
  DISPLAY=:0 nxproxy -S
then log in to loginserver without any nxproxy involvement.

On loginserver I have GDM2 running with XDMCP enabled. At login I run
some session (maybe gnome or xfce or fluxbox, or something homegrown).
For now, manually (in an xterm) I run
  nxproxy -C link=1m connect=thinclient
and then use things like
  DISPLAY=:8 nautilus
(or "DISPLAY=:8 xterm" and run further things from there).

My plan, once nxproxy is "stable", is to run "nxproxy -C" within
/etc/gdm/Xsession and set the new DISPLAY there, so the whole login
session will go through nxproxy.

OT here: Note that I plan to package MDM (the GDM2 fork in Linux Mint) for Debian. Depending on the cooperation upstream (Linux Mint) I may simply use their MDM version or even fork MDM (as MATE Display Manager then, or something similar).

Also, nautilus may request some extension not supported on our
client-side system. Or request an extension version that's not
available. ...

I have no idea what extensions the Xorg server, or clients like
nautilus, may handle.

My feeling is that nxproxy should be "transparent": if things work
without it (whatever both nautilus and Xorg handle), then nxproxy
should allow it unchanged. If nxproxy wants to be smart and make sense
of the X protocol (and achieve a better result than e.g. "ssh -C -X")
then it should be so (smart and actually understand the X protocol).

/me nods on the above.

Thanks for your great and persevering work on this!
Mike


--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb

Attachment: pgpYzfjsCrzNS.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

Reply via email to