On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:32:34PM +0000, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > I tested your patch when debootstrapping from squeeze, it did work. Should > > I test some more scenarios (cdebootstrap? 2-phase cross-arch debootstrap? > > some other distro?) -- or do you think it should be safe? > > Cool, thanks!! If testing is trivial for you then I'm sure this would be > appreciated (in particular the "it did not work before, but not it works" > improvement). While I wouldn't really expect any new problems, I don't know > enough about, e.g., cdebootstrap so maybe something could go wrong over there?
I just tested: no patch your patch squeeze debootstrap ✕ ✓ wheezy debootstrap ✕ ✓ unstable debootstrap ✓ ✓ hacked in #766459 squeeze cdebootstrap ✕ ✕ wheezy cdebootstrap ✕ ✕ unstable cdebootstrap ✓ ✓ squeeze cdebootstrap dies after extraction, before unpacking: E: Execution failed: No such file or directory wheezy cdebootstrap dies immediately: P: Retrieving InRelease P: Validating InRelease I: Good signature from "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) <ftpmas...@debian.org>" (or on my partial mirror: W: Couldn't validate InRelease!) P: Parsing InRelease W: parser_rfc822: Iek! Don't find end of field, it seems to be after the end of the line! E: Couldn't parse InRelease! So cdebootstrap failures are unrelated to this bug. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
