Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> texlive does not have such a hack, therefore you can depend on >> "..|texlive-*" only after the second part. > > True. I forgot on this. > > No problem with me. I have the texlive packages currently only > recommending the respective tipa package, but I will remove this > recommend as these packages do *not* work with texlive (texlive does > *not* search for /etc/texmf/maps/... - maybe I add a hack ...). > > Sorry Frank again that I forgot about the testing transition.
Well, and I have to apologize that I didn't take the time to look more closely at the bugs you reported. While in principle I stand to what I said, tipa has no dependency except on tex packages, and we need not fear to be tied to some other transition. Therefore I suggest that tipa can apply the complete patch you submitted, with a proper versioned Depends on tetex. Then it will automatically stay in unstable until tetex (or texlive) also migrates to testing. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
