Hi Julien,
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:17:16PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:39:07 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Ahhh, well. I confirm that the 0.10-2 changes need to be taken into
> > consideration now as well. I admit I do not have any personal interest
> > in blitz++. The only reason why I spent some time into it was that
> > years ago somebody asked me for help in this package and now it seems to
> > bit-rot while it has some users.
>
> If it's not actually maintained, we shouldn't ship it in stable, IMO.
It's team maintained and I'll care for RC bugs. However, as I said I
have no perosnal interest and the version currently in testing is RC bug
free. I simply wanted to fix all other bugs before a stable release and
I started to do it a bit late. My argument was just that my interest is
low enough that I could perfectly live with the non-RC buggy version
in testing instead of keeping several people (including me) busy.
Hope this clarifies things
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
