Hi, On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:44:09PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > Andreas Tille wrote (29 Oct 2014 14:17:27 GMT) : > > Here you can reas the reasons given by upstream why Debian should > > take over this well more tested version: > > It's good to know that upstream has expanded the scope of their > automated test suite. OTOH, considering the new release to be "more > tested" seems to be a little bit far-fetched, given it has not been > announced on the upstream website yet :)
Upstream in CC. > Additional info for whoever will make the decision: > > * The version currently in testing has no bug known to Debian, > except a wishlist one flagged as wontfix. > * The debian/changelog entry for 3.4.0-1 doesn't close any bug. > * Low popcon: 10 for libcamitk3. > > > as far as I understood no debdiff is needed for this request. > > My understanding of the freeze policy is different: > https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html We are before Freeze and I was explicitly asked to follow https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/10/msg00001.html which says: You don't need to provide a debdiff until the main freeze starts. I was refering to this statement and a debdiff does not make any sense when injecting a new upstream version. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
