On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:30:56AM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > Le jeudi 01 décembre 2005 à 11:50 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen a écrit : > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:14:32PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > > Package: asterisk > > > Version: 1:1.2.0.dfsg-4 > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/asterisk-1.2.0.dfsg$ debuild > > > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is asterisk dpkg-buildpackage: source > > > version is 1:1.2.0.dfsg-3bxlug0 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is > > > Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386 > > > fakeroot debian/rules clean > > > dpatch deapply-all > > > nooptimize not applied to ./ . > > > nomarch not applied to ./ . > > > pubkey_jnctn not applied to ./ . > > > reverting patch 98_fpm-sounds from ./ ... failed. > > > > For future bug reports with a failed applied dpatch: please provide the > > contents of debian/patched/<patchname>.failed . It should help . > > > > Anyway: a fix to the simptom: remove Makefile.rej from that patch. > > Pleae, check your dpatches for .rej and .orig files. > How is it that it tries to patch a .rej? Especially because this .rej > does not exist after build. > This must be a bug, no? > If it is actually a bug, we should fix it.
Sorry, bad phrasing on my part. I have replied to that message after after (or just before? I don't remember) submitting the fix for that to the pkg-voip subversion. The fix should be rathersimple: manually edit that dpatch file and remove the part of it that relates to Makefile.rej. I tend to believe that something in the lines of sed -i -e '/Makefile.rej/,$d' debian/patches/Makefile.dpatch would actually work. But I haven't tested it.... When a patch gets rejected a developer can try editing it with dpatch to fix it. However dpatch-edit-patch saves all the changes. And it is easy to forget cleaning up some .rej or .orig files. Regards -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com
