On 28.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Michael, > > It appears that the purging of tetex should at some point have at least > > hinted at the existence of tex-common. > > Why should it? I think most people would be rather annoyed by > that. Moreover there might be also other packages that install > files in /etc/texmf, but do not depend on tetex-base or tex-common > (e.g. because they only Recommend or Suggest it). > > You should never remove any files or directories in the realm of > dpkg unless you know what you are doing. And "knowing" also > involves bringing yourself up-to-date, or running > > dlocate $directory_I_plan_to_remove > Are these explanations sufficient. Can we close that bug now? H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
